
As a school assignment we had to redesign a system of pictograms (e.g. the symbols for the different sports in the Olympics). I've been working with emoticons, because I think it's a completely preposterous idea to begin with. The new system is meant as a critique of the virtual absence of feelings on the web, which I think is a result of the sheer amount of communication we undertake. It takes time to verbally explain a complex state or feeling to someone who can't see it firsthand. And so we don't - or even worse, resort to crude graphic symbols. These symbols parasite on the communication until they completely take over - one day your best friend will just send you a yellow circle. It's said that a picture says more than a thousand words, but it this case a sentence may say more than ten pictures. This is because the symbol eventually becomes identified with the code word you use to create it.
E.g. this
will mean just mean :unsure: (providing you know the correct code!) without encompassing all the possible nuances of uncertainty or indecision. The new system has two parameters: level of engagement (0 to 255) and positivity/negativity (-255 to 255). So you would enter something like :234,-143:, and the impossibility of discerning anything but the most dramatic of differences will result in a re-evaluation of its use. Wouldn't it be better just to take a bit of time to explain how you really feel? Because people do care, whatever you may think.
How much does this actually tell you?
E.g. this

How much does this actually tell you?

No comments:
Post a Comment